Worrell gets 14 years non parole

Print

Mon, 15 Feb 2010 5:15p.m.

A picture of Tony Worrell taken in 2008

A picture of Tony Worrell taken in 2008

By Jerram Watts and James Murray

Convicted murderer Tony Worrell has been sentenced to 14 years non parole for the murder of Katie Powles in June 2008.

Worrell's lawyer Matthew Goodwin says he will appeal the decision.

Justice Pamela Andrews sentenced Worrell to 7 years for the grievous bodily harm charge and 18 months for each attempted intentional damage charge.

All will be served concurrently.

In sentencing Justice Andrews spoke of Worrell's 14 convictions in two years since arriving in New Zealand from Australia.

He had convictions for resisting police, male assaults female, assaulting police and driving with excess breath alcohol.

Justice Andrews said Worrell's actions had "devastating and profound consequences for those involved.

A victim of Worrell's, Brett Robinson, 43, read a victim's impact statement at today's sentencing.

"He was not forced to drive into my car and cause the damage to my family and myself but he chose to.

"He was not forced to drive into Katie's car and kill her, but he chose to.

"The choices he made were his, and his alone.

"This individual is selfish and self centred, he has done nothing but take from the community.

"What he has done cannot be undone."

Crown prosecutor Kieran Raftery talked about a man who was “entirely self-centred”, who had struggled with alcohol and the abuse of medication for his diabetes.

"Mr Worrell could have driven into a lamp post, he could have driven off a cliff, he could have done any number of things which would not cause harm to anyone else."

Worrell was found guilty on November 6, 2009 of murdering newlywed Katie Powles and injuring another driver.

The 50-year-old West Aucklander was accused of deliberately crashing his car into other vehicles at speed; he faced charges of murder, causing grievous bodily harm and attempted intentional damage.

Katie Powles, 26, died when Worrell’s car struck her vehicle in Karaka, south of Auckland, on June 3, 2008.

Ms Powles had been married just four months before the incident.

Another man, Brett Robinson, was seriously injured.

Investigators told the jury there was no way for Ms Powles to avoid Worrell’s car, which was travelling at speeds between 80 and 100km/h at impact.

The jury heard that Worrell did not attempt to brake before the collision.

Worrell pleaded not guilty to the charges, and broke down in court when the jury, which took more than a day to deliberate and still could be unanimous, returned with a guilty verdict.

He shook his head and sobbed uncontrollably when the jury found he was a murderer.

Worrell’s lawyer Matthew Goodwin said after the trial his client was sorry for the suffering he caused, and could not remember the events that unfolded on June 3.

Prison staff closely monitored Worrell’s mental state as there were fears he may have attempted to take his own life.

Dr Martin Wolley helped treat Worrell when he was hospitalised four days before the crashes for combining alcohol and sedatives.

Worrell was assessed but not found to be suicidal; he was, however, suffering from very low blood sugar levels, or hypoglycaemia.

"People at that stage can get irritable, drowsy, a bit like they are intoxicated," says Dr Wolley.

But under cross-examination, the doctor said Worrell was highly unlikely to have been suffering from hypoglycaemia when he crashed.

3 News

Become a fan of 3 News on Facebook and on Twitter.

Post a Comment

Before commenting, please take the time to read our moderation guide


(Won't be published)



Comments

16 Feb 2010 06:15a.m.

shelly wrote:

Hey man wake up and smell the roses, You killed another person and you did that on purpose. To me you have got off lightly as you are still alive, Katie. Anyone who kills another should get life and I mean life not years.Katie's life has ended and now for you what will you get YES you will get a warm bed hot water 3 meals a day a roof over your head no worries about bills or where your next meal is comming from it will now all be given to you and I might add my tax money not only paid for your lawyer but will now also pay to house and feed you.A life was taken a husband and family lost a loved one and you think you have something to complain about.Stop wasting our $$$ Face up shut up and do the time hopefully you will have a hard time inside and will see just what you have done to others.To top it all off you had only been in NZ for 2 years when all this happened and had clocked up 14 convictions WHENor IF you get out of jail I would hope like hell you are send back over the water to where you came from MORE THAN ENOUGH OF OUR MONEY HAS AND WILL HAVE BEEN SPEND ON YOU. The only person you fell sorry for is yourself.

15 Feb 2010 10:55p.m.

Nick wrote:

What really gets me angry about cases like this is the defense always claims the accused is remorseful at sentencing then promptly turn around and appeal the sentence! A truly remorseful person would accept whatever punishment they're given as what they deserve - otherwise they're just BSing the judge in order to get a lighter sentence!

15 Feb 2010 09:44p.m.

Andrew wrote:

He was sentenced to life in prison with a minimum non-parole period of 14 years. That is not a 14 year sentence! But what infuriates me are these vexatious appeals. What decision is he appealing against? The verdict of the jury or the sentence handed down by the judge? He was charged and ultimately convicted of murder. The crime of murder carries with it a mandatory life sentence. Justice having been done, this guy can rot in hell.

15 Feb 2010 08:03p.m.

katrina wrote:

I am all for this sentence but how come he gets 14 years but the lady who killed the school teacher when she knocked him off his bike while she was drunk (not for the first time) only got 18 months and other people who have visciously murdered people have got less sentences, there is real inconsistency in sentencing.

15 Feb 2010 05:53p.m.

Bizo wrote:

Good. Deserves every single second of it. He looked a crushed man when he was found guilty, makes my heart go out to him a little. But driving into another person on purpose is just ridiculous. Hope prison sorts him out.

15 Feb 2010 05:41p.m.

dude wrote:

What!! only 14 yrs? and he is appealing, he's got a cheek after what he's done,and if he wants to top himself let him,societys not needing him.